Should children with asthma be tested for peanut allergy?

Dr. John Overholt • May 19, 2015

Forging a False Connection



During the recent American Thoracic Society meeting a study was presented that has caused a bit of a stir in the press. Headlines have included: “Many children with asthma have reaction to peanuts but don’t know it,” “The connection between peanut allergies(sic) and asthma,” and “Asthma symptoms in children may be a sign of peanut allergies(sic).” The authors of the study suggest that children with asthma should be routinely tested for peanut allergy. I think this is a bad idea and the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI) agrees with me. Let’s look a bit at the study and the author’s incorrect conclusion.



This study, conducted by Dr. Robert Cohn from Mercy Children’s in Toledo, Ohio, looked at about 1,500 children who were actively followed in their clinic for asthma. They did a chart review and found that about 11% of the kids had a “documented history” of peanut allergy. They then looked at the 650 or so kids who had peanut tests and found that 22% of them had positive tests. They go on to say that 50% of the families were unaware of the peanut sensitivity and that, “We speculate that children with asthma might benefit from peanut sensitivity screening especially when control is difficult to achieve.”

This sort of 'fishing expedition' leads to incorrect diagnoses, false positive tests, and unnecessary anxiety and lifestyle modifications.

This conclusion is wrong for several reasons.
  • First, a positive peanut test does NOT indicate peanut allergy. Peanut testing has a high false positive rate, especially in children who are otherwise allergic. Indeed, some studies have suggested that 80% of positive peanut tests are false positives. A positive test indicates sensitization, which is not the same as allergy.
  • Second, food allergies do not play a role in asthma. Though food allergies can cause respiratory symptoms, usually in conjunction with hives and swelling, these symptoms occur within minutes of exposure to the offending food. They do not cause chronic, ongoing symptoms as found in asthma. Furthermore, they do not have any role in the ongoing inflammation that underlies asthma.
  • Finally, routine testing for foods is never indicated without a history that is consistent with food allergy. This sort of “fishing expedition” leads to incorrect diagnoses, false positive tests, and unnecessary anxiety and lifestyle modification. It causes more questions than it answers.
Though food allergy testing is not useful in asthma, testing for aeroallergens like pollen, animals and dust mites can be very helpful in guiding avoidance of specific triggers and, in some cases, utilizing specific immunotherapy. If you or your child has allergies and asthma, contact a board certified allergist in your area.

You might also like

Celebrate Summer Safely With Asthma

By Dr. Phil Jones • July 4, 2026
Summer is in full swing! Learn why some seasonal activities can cause flare-ups and how you can protect your lungs while still enjoying the festivities.
Mailbox

Mail-in Allergy Testing

By Dr. Nicholas Cline • May 27, 2026
If you spend any time browsing the internet or social media, you’ve likely seen advertisements for mail-in allergy kits. They promise to test for hundreds of food intolerances and environmental sensitivities using just a few strands of your hair or a quick saliva swab. It sounds incredibly convenient, painless, and comprehensive. But if it sounds like a gimmick, it probably is. While these mail-in tests are heavily marketed, they often lack scientific backing and can leave patients feeling more confused than comforted. The Science of Allergy Testing. What Are We Looking For? To understand why hair and saliva tests don't work, we have to look at how the immune system reacts to allergens. When you have a true allergy, your body produces a very specific type of antibody called IgE (Immunoglobulin E) . These antibodies bind to mast cells (allergy cells), which are on high alert to protect you from perceived invaders like pollen, dust mites, or specific food proteins. The fundamental flaw with mail-in hair and saliva kits comes down to basic biology: Wrong Locations: Mast cells and IgE antibodies are not traditionally found in your hair follicles or saliva. Unreliable Results: Because these testing methods are looking in the wrong place, they are highly unstandardized and unvalidated. You are highly likely to get a flood of false positives or false negatives that are impossible to interpret accurately. What the Experts Say: Major medical organizations strongly advise against these methods. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) explicitly recommends against using hair analysis for food allergy evaluations due to a lack of diagnostic value. Furthermore, the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI) and the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI) have issued strong practice guidelines stating that hair analysis should not be used to evaluate food allergies. The Big Misconception: IgE vs. IgG Many mail-in companies charge anywhere from $150 to upwards of $600 for "sensitivity" panels. When patients produce these multi-page reports, the testing is almost always checking for IgG (Immunoglobulin G) antibodies, not IgE. There is a massive difference between the two:

It's Not The Spring Flowers

By Dr. Nicholas Cline • May 11, 2026
The Science Behind Spring Sneezes